Gracia Lam

Looking across fences

The main intention to establish an Austrian Neuroscience Association (ANA) in 1993 was to promote neuroscience research in Austria and to aid its presentation to the public. To achieve these goals, the ANA initiated various activities since then. One of them was to give a comprehensive overview of teaching activities related to neuroscience at Austrian universities.
Since 1999, teaching activities related to neuroscience at universities in Vienna have been explored and compiled in a catalogue of lectures, arranged in several disciplines, from basic natural science up to more complex cognitive science domains. The interdisciplinary nature of neuroscience research, however, makes it difficult to decide where the boundaries should be drawn.
While neurological and psychiatric diseases as Parkinson's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease, Schizophrenia and Depression without any doubt represent areas of central interest for neuroscience research, it might be questioned if every single lecture or seminar dealing with these diseases should automatically be part of a neuroscience lecture catalogue.
Similarly, the specifically human faculties of thinking and reasoning and establishing communicative societies have their roots in our brains. Nevertheless, a comprehensive collection of lectures related to these faculties would surely be outside the scope of a catalogue of neuroscience and cognitive science lectures.
Therefore, a hunt for appropriate lectures in the jungles of the pertinent online catalogues of courses cannot simply be accomplished by loading your rifle with convenient keywords. First, you would end up with an intimidating stack of largely inappropriate prey; and second, you would miss the most interesting game.
I've been pursuing this neverending hunt now for the last several years, and I still experience at the beginning of each semester the exciting thrill as if I were on the track of a new beetle or butterfly species. My horizon has expanded continuously, including today archaeology and theology, domains quite exotic from a neuroscientific point of view.
The feedback up to now was rather mixed. The greatest part of the reactions (>99%) concerned formal corrections or wishes to be included with additional lectures. Exponents of natural science disciplines expressed their concern of including the humanities. However, from these latter domains came the most positive reactions.
Especially in the humanities, I can testify to a high turnover of interesting contents. While many clinical and molecular lectures appear year after year without any change, philosophers and social scientists change their contents rapidly. And from their side comes the most enthusiastic welcome for our catalogue, since they are eager to learn about the lectures of colleagues in neighbouring disciplines.
Looking across the fences of our disciplines should be the natural habit of scientists devoted to multidisciplinary research. Unfortunately, this habit is not very popular among natural scientists; at least, that's my impression after all these years of hunting in the wilderness of neuroscience and cognitive science teaching courses.
7/11 <         MB 2/12          > 2/12